Enjoying this Collapse of the Conservative Party? It's Comprehensible – Yet Completely Incorrect

On various occasions when Tory figureheads have seemed reasonably coherent on the surface – and different periods where they have come across as animal crackers, yet were still adored by party loyalists. This is not such a scenario. One prominent Conservative left the crowd unmoved when she addressed her conference, while she presented the provocative rhetoric of border-focused rhetoric she believed they wanted.

The issue wasn't that they’d all arisen with a renewed sense of humanity; rather they didn’t believe she’d ever be in a position to implement it. In practice, an imitation. The party dislikes such approaches. An influential party member apparently called it a “New Orleans funeral”: boisterous, energetic, but nonetheless a farewell.

What Next for this Party Having Strong Arguments to Make for Itself as the Top-Performing Governing Force in History?

Some are having renewed consideration at one contender, who was a hard “no” at the start of the night – but as things conclude, and other candidates has departed. Another group is generating a excitement around a rising star, a young parliamentarian of the newest members, who appears as a traditional Conservative while saturating her online profiles with immigration-critical posts.

Could she be the figurehead to counter opposition forces, now outpolling the incumbents by a substantial lead? Does a term exist for defeating opponents by becoming exactly like them? And, assuming no phrase fits, perhaps we might adopt a term from fighting disciplines?

Should You Take Pleasure In Any of This, in a How-the-Mighty-Are-Fallen Way, in a Consequence-Based Way, It's Comprehensible – Yet Totally Misguided

One need not look at the US to understand this, or reference a prominent academic's influential work, the historical examination: every one of your synapses is emphasizing it. Centrist right-wing parties is the essential firewall against the radical elements.

Ziblatt’s thesis is that democracies survive by keeping the “propertied and powerful” happy. I have reservations as an guiding tenet. It feels as though we’ve been indulging the affluent and connected for decades, at the expense of the broader population, and they don't typically become quite happy enough to halt efforts to make cuts out of social welfare.

But his analysis is not speculation, it’s an archival deep dive into the Weimar-era political organization during the interwar Germany (combined with the England's ruling party in that historical context). Once centrist parties falters in conviction, as it begins to adopt the terminology and superficial stances of the far right, it cedes the steering wheel.

There Were Examples Similar Patterns During the Brexit Years

A key figure associating with an influential advisor was a notable instance – but extremist sympathies has become so obvious now as to overshadow all remaining party narratives. Where are the established party members, who prize predictability, conservation, legal frameworks, the pride of Britain on the international platform?

Why have we lost the reformers, who defined the United Kingdom in terms of growth centers, not volatile situations? To be clear, I wasn’t wild about any of them either, but it's remarkably noticeable how these ideologies – the inclusive conservative, the modernizing wing – have been erased, superseded by ongoing scapegoating: of immigrants, Muslims, social support users and demonstrators.

Appear at Podiums to Themes Resembling the Opening Credits to the Popular Series

And talk about positions they oppose. They portray rallies by older demonstrators as “displays of hostility” and employ symbols – national emblems, Saint George’s flags, any item featuring a splash of matadorial colour – as an direct confrontation to individuals doubting that total cultural alignment is the highest ideal a individual might attain.

There doesn’t seem to be any inherent moderation, encouraging reassessment with fundamental beliefs, their historical context, their stated objectives. Whatever provocation Nigel Farage offers them, they pursue. Consequently, definitely not, it’s not fun to see their disintegration. They’re taking social cohesion into the abyss.

Keith Fitzgerald
Keith Fitzgerald

A passionate writer and traveler sharing experiences and advice to inspire personal growth and adventure.