🔗 Share this article

Mainstream political parties are more and more allowing the radical right to set the public discourse, according to a new study carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics found that this trend has inadvertently benefited far-right parties by validating their ideas and disseminating them to a broader audience.

Analysis Based on Over 20 Years of News Reporting

The results, released in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an computerized content review of more than 520,000 news pieces from six national publications.

Capital-based researchers observed that as the radical faction moved from fringe issues in the late 1990s to core subjects like assimilation and migration, established political groups progressively adapted their messaging in reaction.

This adjustment boosted the spread of these concepts and indicated to voters that such stances were acceptable.

Implications for Democracy

"Public communication by mainstream parties is crucial in the voting performance of the far right," stated a political sociologist participating in the study.

"This element has been overlooked," she added.

The impact was evident even when mainstream parties were condemning the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the researcher commented. "The main point is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is crucial."

Normalisation Effect Throughout Europe

While the research was focused on the German context, this mainstreaming phenomenon is likely to apply to countries throughout the European continent.

"You see this a lot in European news outlets," said another co-author. "Radical groups says something and everyone starts talking about it for several days."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he added.

Toughening of Public Discourse

At certain points, leaders have also toughened their language to match that of the far right.

In a recent interview, a former national leader advocated large-scale expulsions and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable instances can be found across Europe, as politicians from nations including the UK to the French Republic adopt the rhetoric of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was unthinkable a decade ago.

Core Problem: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate political group and you are talking about cultural issues – migration, integration – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the far right, that's the whole idea of narrative control," explained a study author.

Some parties have taken additional measures, seeking to copy the hardline agenda of the radical right, despite research suggests that this approach leads voters to cast their ballot for the radical faction.

Progressive Influence and Voter Awareness

The extent of information collected showed that the influence of far-right groups had been gradual and had increased with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," stated a co-author. "But if you encounter this negative framing around immigration every second week, and it is being disseminated not only by radical groups but also, for example, by established parties, then of course this storyline travels further."

Need for Established Groups to Carve Out Their Own Discourses

The study highlighted the need for established parties to develop their own narratives, particularly on topics such as immigration and assimilation, rather than constantly following the radical right.

"It resembles a choreography," said one author. "If the conductor is far-right and you're reacting to it, you lose the ability to choose which tune should be playing."